The Masculine and Feminine Modes.
Additionally, you failed to recognize the Jungian unconscious masculine and feminine components. These classical universal psycho sexual components – or “archetypes” as Jung called them [vide. C. G. Jung, ‘The Collected Works’, vol.9, pt.1 ‘The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious’, ch.vi ‘Conscious, Unconscious, and Individuation’ p.284] are present in both sexes. Firstly, the ‘anima’, the feminine component in the male personality. Secondly, the ‘animus’, the masculine component in the female personality. Your assumptions appears to have been formulated solely from the perspective of the overt effeminate persona, with emphasis upon the ‘anima’ without acknowledgement of the ‘animus’ , a gross misconception indeed. This has the effect of effeminating all homosexuals; in the eyes of your readership.
Your assumptions also fail to acknowledge, and understand those, i.e., ego-syntonic homosexuals, whose inherited libidinal impulse are directed towards an exclusive sexual propensity for others of their own sex, and furthermore, you ignore the fact that their propensity for the opposite sex would be contrary to organization and criterion of their own individual psycho-sexual consciousness. In like manner, propensity of the ego-syntonic heterosexual towards the same sex, would customarily be contrary to their libidinal impulse; although not always clearly categorized as such at the pragmatic level, e.g., the theoretical “bisexual” mode, perhaps expressed in an isolated (or exclusive) male environment, thus: ‘facultative homosexuality’, transitory experimental teenage mutual masturbation; or generallyfaute de mieux.
In their article, ‘Sex in Australia: Homosexual experience and recent homosexual encounters’, Professor Andrew E. Grulich, Ph. D., et al, suggested:
“Overall, 8.6% of women and 5.9% of men reported some homosexual sexual experience in their lives (p<0.001); these figures fell to 5.7% and 5.0% respectively (p=0.106) when non-genital sexual experience was excluded. 1.9% of men and 1.5% of women reported homosexual experience in the past year. Men who reported homosexual experience reported more same-sex partners than did women (means 31.6 and 3.2, p<0.001), and men and women who identified as homosexual or “bisexual” reported more sexual partners in total than those who identified as heterosexual”.
(Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health’, April 2003).
The above data summarizes a marked divergence of sexual activity, taken from a sample, that theoretically represent sexual experiences (or modes) within the population; that may not necessarily be rationalized within a static ‘homosexual context’; but perhaps in a transient oscillatory context. It is reasonable to assume that there is present an indubitable preference for one or the other.